River Erosion and Accretion
River erosion is the removal of material from the banks and beds of rivers and streams (cf. Lawler, 1993). River accretion is the formation of new land such as channel bars, sandbanks and deltas by sedimentation or changing river flow (after Islam and Guchhait, 2020 and Hasanuzzaman et al., 2024).
Primary reference(s)
Lawler, D.M., 1993. The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: a review. Earth surface processes and landforms, 18(9), pp.777-821. Accessed 13 February 2025.
Hasanuzzaman, M., Islam, A., Bera, B. and Shit, P.K., 2024. Quantifying the riverbank erosion and accretion rate using DSAS model study from the lower Ganga River, India. Natural Hazards Research, 4(4), pp.550-561. Accessed 7 February 2025
Islam, A., & Guchhait, S. K. (2020). Characterizing cross-sectional morphology and channel inefficiency of lower Bhagirathi River, India, in post-Farakka barrage condition. Natural hazards, 103(3), 3803-3836. Accessed 21 Nov 2024.
Annotations
Additional scientific description
Riverbank erosion occurs by three main mechanisms: fluvial scour (entrainment of bed and bank sediments due to hydraulic forces exceeding the resisting forces), mass failure (erosion caused when large volumes of sediment slide or topple from the bank) or subaerial erosion (processes external to the stream, e.g. groundwater seepage or cattle pugging). River energy, the primary driver for erosion and accretion, differs between, along, and seasonally within river systems. Erosion rates increase if the hydraulic force increases (i.e. the flow of water) and/or the resisting forces decrease (e.g. the removal of vegetation). Consequently, riverbank erosion and accretion are continuous processes, amplified by higher energy events such as flooding.
Stream erosion is also associated with river scour, whereby bed sediment is eroded and may be redistributed (accretion). River scour is commonly focused on changes in bedform, which may be natural or artificial. For example, the impacts of scour on bridge foundations and other engineered infrastructure are well documented (Ozaukee County, no date).
Background weathering that facilitates erosion includes processes that are subject to seasonality, and include flooding, precipitation, crack formation, cryogenic processes, poaching and anthropogenic changes to the natural geomorphology (Darby et al., 2007).
River erosion and accretion are natural processes; however, anthropogenic activities and climate change have substantially accelerated their rates (Koutalakis et al., 2024).
Metrics and numeric limits
Published data, e.g. Hooke (1980) have presented results that demonstrate a relationship between erosion rates (m/yr) and catchment area (km2), with annual erosion rates ranging from 0.5 m to 1000 m for drainage areas of 4 to 1000,000 km2, respectively.
Key relevant UN convention / multilateral treaty
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (Watercourses Convention): Adopted in 1997, this convention provides a framework for the use and protection of international watercourses, promoting cooperation and equitable utilization of shared water resources.
Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Water Convention): Adopted in 1992, this convention aims to ensure the sustainable use of transboundary water resources, prevent and control water-related hazards, and protect ecosystems.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030.
Drivers
River erosion is primarily driven by the bank erodibility and water erosivity. River erosion is accelerated by flood events, however antecedent conditions contribute to conditioning of the riverbank (Darby et al., 2007). Conditions such as antecedent flow, (e.g. high water levels cause saturated banks which are less stable), or periods of low flow (which can result in unstable dry and cracking banks) and the condition the riparian zone (i.e. bedrock, or the presence and condition of riparian vegetation which provide reinforcement of the banks and reduce near bank velocities) contribute to the resistance of the bank to erosion. Erosion is also accelerated by activities such as sediment extraction, river modifications and livestock grazing (Wilkinson et al. 2022). In areas with cold climates, the movement of river ice during the spring thaw can result in river erosion.
River erosion and accretion are associated with a few triggering hazards. For example, river flooding leads to bank collapse; ground shaking also induces the riverbank failure due to vibrating actions. Liquefaction through groundwater movement can trigger the weakening of the bank materials, leading to erosion. Moreover, some man-made hazards like deforestation, sand mining and dam failure trigger river erosion and accretion. Deforestation increases surface run-off potential with higher potential riverbank erosion with greater sediment loads to the river. Sand mining destabilizes the riverbed and bank causing the collapse of the bank. Dam failure results in the huge release of water from the reservoir triggering the swelling of the downstream river courses causing bank failure. Soil erosion or artificial removal of the topsoil induces the collapse of the bottom layer of the soil adjacent to the riverbank. Moreover, sediment flux from the soil erosion also escalates the river accretion process and develops channel bars due to the transport-limited conditions of the river (Islam and Guchhait, 2020).
Impacts
River erosion can result in significant land loss and damage to infrastructure. In South Asia, for example, Bhuiyan et al. (2017) reported that the rivers of Bangladesh are responsible for cumulative annual erosion of up to 10,000 hectares of land. In addition to floodplains and settlements, Bangladesh also loses several kilometers of roads, railways, and flood control embankments each year (Bhuiyan et al., 2017). Widespread land loss, declining per capita income, livelihood crisis, and community conflicts are often reported in the lower Ganga plains (along the Bhagirathi-Hooghly River) in India (Islam and Guchhait, 2017).
In addition to the loss of land and infrastructure, the consequences of stream erosion and riverbank mass wasting are increased suspended sediment loads in streams, which impacts on water quality with consequential implications for human and ecological health (Grove et al., 2015). This includes detrimental impacts on aquatic, terrestrial and semi-aquatic ecosystems (Zaimes et al., 2021).
River accretion can create navigation issues, increase flooding risks, and disrupt natural habitats.
Sea level rise in the wake of climate change is expected to exacerbate the inundation of low-lying areas with swelling of the river courses and bank failure. The foremost visible loss due to riverbank erosion is the financial shock induced by the agricultural land loss, engulfment of settlements and creation of the homelessness and environmental refugees in the areas of the frequent erosions and accretion (Islam and Guchhait, 2024). The emergence of sand bars due to the deposition of riverine sediments can become the source of social conflicts and violence (e.g. Zaman, 1991).
Multi-hazard context
The figure below summarises common interactions between river erosion & accretion and other hazards. This information should be used with caution and not be solely relied upon in Disaster Risk Management, particularly as some interactions may not have been included. Note that hazardous events occurring together or locally in space or time may not necessarily cause, amplify, or be otherwise related to each other. Specific examples of multi-hazard context can be found in the ‘Hazard drivers’ and ‘Impacts’ sections above.
Multi-hazard diagram
Risk Management
River erosion and accretion monitoring and assessment requires a good understanding of these processes; however, they can be highly temporal and spatially complex (Koutalakis et al., 2024). Various methods and tools can be applied to study and monitor stream bank erosion and accretion including field mapping, remote sensing, erosion pins, and laser scanners (see Koutalakis et al., 2024 for more details).
Riverbank vegetation, for example mangroves, contributes to riverbank resilience to erosion, as do alluvial sediments. Mitigation of the impacts of bank erosion includes planning and avoidance, and soft and engineered protection or renaturing. Some examples are presented by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA, 2020) and the Reef Trust, Commonwealth of Australia (Wilkinson et al, 2022).
Monitoring
The section and the table below offer an overview of monitoring river erosion & accretion. This information can be used for forecasting within a national early warning system (EWS). Since EWS capacities and processes differ across countries, the most current and specific information regarding EWS should be obtained from the appropriate national or regional agency/authority responsible for disaster management.
| Which institution(s) produce(s) Disaster Risk Data/Information? | Local/state/national disaster management authority |
| How is the Hazard Observed/Monitored/Forecast? | Common methods for monitoring river siltation include drilling and profile measurement, acoustic and ultrasonic techniques, and intelligent mobile monitoring platforms. In addition, there are also comprehensive evaluation methods for river erosion and siltation, such as hydrological sediment models and time-series dynamic models. Specific instruments/models are: use of erosion pins; Photo Electronic Erosion Pin (PEEP) and PEET-3T; Total station and Terrestrial laser scanner- LiDAR; Bank Assessment of Non-point Source Consequence of Sediment (BANCS)- bank erosion hazard index (BEHI) and near bank stress (NBS); The Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM); Dynamic SedNet Stream Bank Erosion model; Numerical modelling using DSAS model |
References
Bhuiyan, M.A.H., S.M.D. Islam and G. Azam, 2017. Exploring impacts and livelihood vulnerability of riverbank erosion hazard among rural household along the river Padma of Bangladesh. Environmental Systems Research, 6:25. Accessed 13 February 2025.
Darby, S.E., M. Rinaldi and S. Dapporto, 2007. Coupled simulations of fluvial erosion and mass wasting for cohesive river banks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 112:F03022. doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000722 Accessed 13 February 2025.
Grove, M.K., Bilotta, G.S., Woockman, R.R. and Schwartz, J.S. 2015. Suspended sediment regimes in contrasting reference- condition freshwater ecosystems: Implications for water quality guidelines and management. Science of The Total Environment, 502:481-492.
Hooke, J.M., 1980. Magnitude and distribution of rates of river bank erosion. Earth Surface Processes, 1:143-157.
Islam, A., & Guchhait, S. K. (2020). Characterizing cross-sectional morphology and channel inefficiency of lower Bhagirathi River, India, in post-Farakka barrage condition. Natural hazards, 103(3), 3803-3836.
Islam, A., Das, B. C., Mahammad, S., Ghosh, P., Barman, S. D., & Sarkar, B. (2021). Deforestation and its impact on sediment flux and channel morphodynamics of the Brahmani River Basin, India. In Forest resources resilience and conflicts (pp. 377-415). Elsevier.
Islam, A., & Guchhait, S. K. (2024). Economic Vulnerabilities Induced by Riverbank Erosion. In Riverbank Erosion in the Bengal Delta: An Integrated Perspective (pp. 201-247). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Koutalakis, P.; Gkiatas, G.; Xinogalos, M.; Iakovoglou, V.; Kasapidis, I.; Pagonis, G.; Savvopoulou, A.; Krikopoulos, K.; Klepousniotis, T.; Zaimes, G.N. Estimating Stream Bank and Bed Erosion and Deposition with Innovative and Traditional Methods. Land 2024, 13, 232.
Ozaukee County, no date. Flood Terminology. Accessed 13 February 2025.
Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), 2020. Sustainable Riverbank Protection: Reducing Riverbank Erosion. A best practice guide for farmers and other land managers. Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). Accessed 13 February 2025.
Wilkinson S, Hairsine PB, Bartley R, Brooks A, Pietsch T, Hawdon A, Shepherd R. 2022. Gully and Stream Bank Toolbox. A technical guide for gully and stream bank erosion control programs in Great Barrier Reef catchments. 3rd Edition. Commonwealth of Australia.
Zaimes, G.Ν.; Tamparopoulos, A.E.; Tufekcioglu, M.; Schultz, R.C. Understanding stream bank erosion and deposition in Iowa, USA: A seven-year study along streams in different regions with different riparian land-uses. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021, 287, 112352.
Zaman, M. Q. (1991). Social structure and process in char land settlement in the Brahmaputra-Jamuna floodplain. Man, 673-690.